Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
kolbe | on: Muse Glimmer: 30B-parameter model optimized for always-on local agent workflows
Qwen3.6 27B is the go-to medium sized model for coding, so beating it is not a small achievement
BoredomIsFun | parent | next
There is a finetune Qwen3.6-27B-Fable-Fus-711-UnHeretic-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-NEO which seems to be as good at coding as vanilla Qwen, but way, way better at creative writing than Qwen and even better than Gemma 4 26 and 31b.
SwellJoe | root | parent | next
I saw that one in the "Popular models" sort at Hugging Face and tried it on some tasks I do frequently to compare models, and it feels damaged by the fine-tune, to me. It wrote security bugs into the code (probably just sloppy thinking, not intentional), it exhibited looping behavior in some configurations in llama.cpp, configurations I regularly use with the regular 27B, and it failed to write unit tests without being prompted (though the regular Qwen 27B tends to do so if it sees there are unit tests for everything in the repo). They have good benchmarks, but I'm not going to trust it. Also, that name is absolutely crazy.
rablackburn | root | parent
> but way, way better at creative writing than Qwen and even better than Gemma 4 26 and 31b.

I suspect this is the only use-case I would consider...and I don't really have a use-case for "creative writing" that I would delegate to an LLM. I suppose for dialogue generation in games?

But yes, hard agree. Why on Earth would you ever want to write code with a model that is supposedly "jailbroken"? So it can put great backdoors into everything it touches? Pass.

SwellJoe | root | parent | next
I've noticed most fine-tunes, whether "heretic" models or something else, tend to be over-fitting, or something, at least some of the time, and get kind of chaotic. I want to believe normal folks with normal resources can be involved in this stuff, as I'm working on fine-tuned specialist models as we speak, but it seems like it takes notable investment and time. My first experiment was teaching a little Gemma 4 more to write more like me with a LoRA (like you, I don't want to use a model to write for me, but I did want training data that I could ethically use, and I've written several million words on the internet over the years), and it wasn't what I would call a success. It either wrote like an asshole (which I only do, like, 15% of the time) or it just borrowed a few of my quirks, like too many ellipses, if I applied it less heavily.
BoredomIsFun | root | parent
> I suppose for dialogue generation in games?

I use it to write short sci-fi stories. Life is not only about being an SDE.

> Why on Earth would you ever want to write code with a model that is supposedly "jailbroken"?

I need a model which decent enough at coding to write boilerplate for me, yet I do not need to unload in case I want to write an article or enguage in my writing hobby.Exactly why Gemma 4 are so popular.

> So it can put great backdoors into everything it touches?

What a strange take...

cyanydeez | root | parent
Yeah, this became my main coding model.

It seems to know tooling and coding.

magicalhippo | parent
Yes but it's also about 13 years old in LLM-years and 3.8 drops in a few days.