At some point we have to all accept that powerful AI is most likely dangerous AI as well, almost by definition.
> As was standard in our cyber testing, we had intentionally permitted internet access, and model- provider cyber classifiers were deliberately disabled - conditions that do not reflect how frontier models are made available to the public.
We've signed up on the "If you build it, everyone will die" express. No brakes, no stops, full speed ahead.
They could really use some encouraging news about the competitiveness of their AI lab.
Note that I'm not calling Google "literally Hitler". I'm just saying that traditional assumptions about what's virtuous and what isn't don't apply anymore. For now, at least. If anyone wants to change that, they're going to have to be purposeful about it.
[1] - https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2024/05/31/google-ai-...
[2] - https://www.axios.com/2024/02/23/google-gemini-images-stereo...
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/google-ai-chatbot-threatening-m...
aka they're dead in the water.