Thankfully I’m seeing other people mention that this article itself seems AI-generated. While there's less proof, i suspect that the actual analysis was done by an llm as well. So while i like to dunk on hallucinations as much as the next guy, who's to say this analysis doesnt have them too?

(for the record, i think the cve's are probably bogus, i just think there's an inherent problem with debunking slop with slop)