Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
testaburger | on: DeepSeek pause fundraise after comments on compute gap to US leaked (transcript) [pdf]
there's a lot of propganda from these state backed enterprises. I think the fraction of the cost label is debatable given the evidence of mass gpu smuggling through third parties like Singapore which China can't exactly openly admit to. Unless of course we're talking about distilling, which is probably a lot cheaper than training a model from scratch (there's also the fact that labour is still relatively cheap in China compared to the US which may or may not matter e.g. Anthropic claim against Alibaba > The campaign allegedly used nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to run 28.8 million exchanges with Claude between April and June 2026 (although their campaign could have been in part or all automated via agents, not sure)
trollbridge | parent | next
Is there really a valid basis for claims like "state backed enterprises"? My understanding is that's no different than claiming that datacentres in America are "state backed" since they get things like big breaks on property taxes.
loading story #49054933
killingtime74 | parent
All that and so what? Fact is the Chinese have several near peer models, they've released the weights and they are widely available.

You want to sue them or something?

Levitz | root | parent | next
Suing is absurd as it would get nowhere, since this is China we are talking about.

Now, preventing making business in the US based on those products? At this point it's hard to argue against.

testaburger | root | parent
> You want to sue them or something?

I mean, if this were an american company vs an american company, i think it would be a long drawn out civil case and brought before the Supreme Court (I still this is ultimately will be brought before the supreme court). It could also be argued frontier models are far more important to national security than most military programs, even versus next gen fighter jets.

The fact that Alibaba stock, which is also listed on the NYSE, barely budged after Anthropic made these claims imo tells me that the market doesn't think that a lone american company could go after these companies by themselves. Alibaba denied and there's not much they can do alone, I mean would the CCP allow Alibaba go through a discovery process of a normal civil trial? It might have to be the US feds that bring up a case.

I think it could be argued that if Alibaba and other China companies want access to US capital markets for something so vital for national security, there should be some ground rules, but we will eventually need the Supreme court to settle whether or not this state enterprise distilling constitutes IP theft (at the very least it is a breach of contract). The fact that they are widely available doesn't really matter (i mean pirated content is widely available, it's ultimately about how the court rules on distilling).

based on this HN comment and associated article https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48977128#48985989 I still have yet to see a China open weight model beat any of the frontier models, they always almost there yet never quite there, which seems to be evidence of distilling (although I'm open to be proven wrong).