When accusing someone of "good looking lies", it would help to provide an example or two with an explanation of why you think they're lies (rather than mistakes, oversights or differences of opinion). Complaints that the post "subtly and misleadingly throws shade at Zig" are hard to accept without that kind of support.
I did this there: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48898514
But others did before me in this very HN submission, we are not going to repeat everything in every comment, are we?
It's not the first lies from Anthropic and more generally from the AI industry as a whole neither. It's their default communication mode.