Reading their modified license terms, it cracks me up, because they've basically remade the MIT to be the MIT + the one clause that the BSD used to have, which didn't care about MAU or revenue, if you used it in a product, they asked you to 'advertise' them basically. Honestly, its a reasonable request.
loading story #48507102
This is the cursor callout.
Don't make us shame you into disclosure
Cursor had a specific licensing agreement that allowed them to brand it how they want.
Wasn't the end of that story that Cursor had a non-disclosure licence, so they had not done anything wrong towards Moonshot?
loading story #48504375
Ah is that what it is? I don't use Cursor, never saw it as being relevant to me, but would not surprise me.
loading story #48503865
Shaming others when all AI is trained off scraped content and code huh? Many of those sources either breaking ToS or being illegal, such as Anna’s Archive. Bold move. And Chinese models in particular have been accused of distilling off American models.
Don’t you know there’s no honor among thieves?
loading story #48506387
> they asked you to 'advertise' them basically.
To be clear, the “advertising” clause just requires you to disclose that you use the thing somewhere in the product, such as credits in an “About” section.