Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
> the safeguards will limit effectiveness through methods such as prompt modification, steering vectors, or parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT)

Holy crap that is dark. I like learning about ML for fun, and now I have to assume that their model is intentionally misinforming me to sabotage my learning? It is absolutely bananas that somebody decided that was ok behavior.

loading story #48470653
time to support open source and local models
This comment is not entirely on point with your comment, it circles around it though I think.

If you're not doing work that requires your code to stay in home nation data centres, Claude for Deepseek, Deepclaude (https://github.com/aattaran/deepclaude) is a great way to get better at using Claude like tools for software development. It even does a pretty good job of putting together cover letters for job applications...

Using Deepclaude is very much cheaper than using claude... For hobby projects, I've found it useful. A recipe (for cooking) management app I've made took a couple of hours to put together and cost $US 0.5. Claude is far more expensive.

The downsides of Deepclaude for many are:- - DeepSeek is a Chinese corporation so the Chinese Communist Party may ask for data if it wants it. - DeepClaude isn't quite as fast as normal Claude, though it's still pretty fast. - DeepClaude might not be as optimised for various code issues that Claude may be able to solve more quickly or effectively. - The same safeguards are probably on DeepSeek, but you won't be "wasting" as much money as you might on using Claude.

Inference focused hardware (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvPqHoVSenE, AI generated speech) may in the medium future cause a large enough cost/energy reduction for LLM tools like Claude.

Inference focused hardware would make running Open Source models like DeepSeek on local machines far cheaper and control over safeguards would return to the end user. Hopefully this would lead to a more localised LLM provision market where a local business provides varieties of these "local" LLM services. Here, local could mean on premise through to state or nationally based LLM services. Eventually, government orgs outside of the US may demand this kind of LLM servicing, in the same way governments legally require data to be stored within national borders for many critical government functions.

A bloke can dream I guess...

...Could affordable inference focused hardware also cause the bottom to fall out of these huge stock market valuations and datacentre build costs?... Not to mention the societal costs caused by the AI super corps. At the moment, they're not even making a profit... They seem almost like speculative companies... Is that a term?