At the risk of stepping into a hornets nest: is that different than "knowledge"?
Or maybe, what would it mean if an LLM had no social biases? (Would we ever agree that was the case?)
In general, or if it isn't the correct answer?
Like: young men pay more for car insurance than young women (today). This is based on statistical models. Should they be outlawed? I think that is a very interesting question (but they aren't, today).
If the LLM was in charge, would it be wrong for it to charge young men more? Should we train that "bias" out? Or should we only train out biases that are wrong? And would that be different than how we train them today?
I don't know the answer. But I think it is less obvious than some people seem to think.
It's not interesting to observe that Grok was successfully trained to be an edgelord; anybody paying attention knew that was easily achievable.