The better question is are there any sources that AI is better than human readers? I haven’t heard anyone make this claim outside of single/few disease classification tasks and even those are mostly 2D.

Anecdotally, my practice has most FDA approved AI deployed as we are an evaluation site and very rarely is the AI result useful. Over the past few months we have been cancelling contracts as these cost quite a lot of money (in some cases eating >50% of the study interpretation cost) for little to no benefit and a LOT of noise.