Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
Every single thing in the text you (inaccurately) quoted.

City Hall is no longer on a private estate, no Kuwaiti investment company is involved, and the application process involves no "corporate permission" - you submit a form to the city government, and it sounds like the point is to make sure each rally is allocated a separate area, and they don't deny permission outright.

Please don't be unreasonable.

> Every single thing in the text you (inaccurately) quoted.

Your first sentence makes no sense. It's quoted directly from the Guardian article, not from me.

> it sounds like the point is to make sure each rally is allocated a separate area, and they don't deny permission outright.

FWIW, look at the next article I linked. You're really understating the restrictions for a public, outdoor venue. This is on brand with restrictive public use.

- No noise directed outwards

- no noise after 6PM

- confined to two lawns (that can't fit more than 3k people)

- no sound speakers

- no overnight rallies even if quiet

- leave no trash

- no food for others

- you're strongly advised to fill out a notification form if your group is larger than a dozen people

No, there was a bunch in the middle that you removed.

Most of those restrictions sound pretty standard and reasonable! No amplification is the only one that I’d be upset about as an organizer.

> No, there was a bunch in the middle that you removed.

I didn't remove anything.

It seems you're reading and responding to different discussions.

loading story #48347405