Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
I would never imagine this is where programming would be five years ago, but at the end of day having the AI write the code is easier, faster, and results in higher quality.

The mental model is still in my head, my brain is overloaded, but only from the amount of code reviews - like I said, I'm building v3 of a feature in the time it takes to build v1, but I am in a way doing 3x the code reviews going back and forth. That's the fall out of the iteration speed enabled by AI.

Between submitting PRs, getting feedback, iterating, re-submitting, repeat - there used to be breathing room. Now it's all compressed into an afternoon. Productivity is through the roof, but it can be draining.

You're not on v3 lol. You're on v1 that you had to redo three times.

If the feature isn't released, it's not a new version.

Semantics. In reality yes it is the v3 version equivelent in terms of maturity and iteration. I know because I've been doing this for a long time. We are getting to v3 and beyond faster than ever before.

In the new world there is no time to put out v1 quality code and it is borderline reckless given how easily things are getting hacked now. You need to be putting out heavily reviewed code that covers all the corner cases on the first release.

No, you're getting to v1 in the same or more amount of time. I know v3 sounds better, but coding and throwing it away is literally just redoing it. If you're not releasing it, it's not a new version.

There's no such thing as "v1 quality code", you just haven't finished it yet.

You've missed the point