Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
Different codebase, same purpose.

This isn't even the first time we did a ground-up redesign/rewrite of the Freenet codebase, we did this in 2008 with the 0.7 release.

Neither of you get to be freenet, another project with the name predated it by a lot. and throughout the 90s many ISPs were named $PLACENAME_freenet

https://case.edu/ech/articles/c/cleveland-freenet

Repeating a bad decision does not make it any wiser.
History will be the judge, and so far it's looking very promising given our progress.
What does your progress have to do with the name? You're so defensive that you're reasoning with non sequiturs.
loading story #48232242
Should've called the new one Freenet 2 or Freenet NT.
loading story #48230514
loading story #48230394