Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
The Crunchy Data part is what people should pay more attention to here. He had corporate sponsorship and it was working. Company got acquired, new owners didn't prioritize the same things, and now 3.8k-star critical infrastructure goes dark. Your backup tool's funding depended on someone else's M&A strategy and you had no idea.

I've been gradually moving my own stuff to SQLite and git-tracked files partly because of this. Every managed Postgres setup has a dependency tree of tools maintained by people whose funding situation you know nothing about.

It didn't go dark, and doesn't seem that critical in general.

General idea still stands, but it is not like this just disappeared and backups will stop working.

The favourite model I've seen is the main branch is free, licensed MIT or whatever, but if you want release artifacts that are tested - then you pay for it. You can always compile your own.
Why does sqlite not suffer from the same risk?
loading story #47924609
loading story #47924677
loading story #47929648
loading story #47924175