>"we don't need to read it" [here]

many people here don't read the articles, and that's not going to change. (on today's internet, jumping from the site you want to be on to a site with unknown UX patterns is fraught)

but people here do read the comments, so having important details from the articles in comments here improves the quality of comments here, at least if you value staying on topic.

Why did you read it twice if you didn't need to? Seems unnecessary. I only read it once and just ignored it on subsequent encounters.