I am getting disproportionately good results with the models by following a process: spec -> plan -> critique -> improve plan -> implement plan.
If I may "yes, and" this: spec → plan → critique → improve plan → implement plan → code review
It may sound absurd to review an implementation with the same model you used to write it, but it works extremely well. You can optionally crank the "effort" knob (if your model has one) to "max" for the code review.
loading story #47392533
loading story #47391521
Can you give a little more detail how you execute these steps? Is there a specific tool you use, or is it simply different kinds of prompts?
loading story #47392557
loading story #47391586
similar approach