So maybe the President's special boy shouldn't be tweeting that 150 year olds are receiving Social Security payments because he doesn't understand cobol's datetime system. That only way I take these people seriously is the way I would take a toddler with a lit torch seriously.
If you said "He's making statements without any data to back up his claims" I'd respond, at this point you're correct, we do not have the data to verify. Collectively we could ask for more transparency. The result is we agree more data is needed.
Not too surprising to find another propaganda victim…
Here, I did your research for you:
> After correcting an apparent clerical error, it now shows $8.5 billion.
https://www.npr.org/2025/02/19/nx-s1-5302705/doge-overstates...
Why can't you follow comment guidelines?
Please read commenting guidelines at https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
It's all waste. Fraud if there were kickbacks, we'll see about that.
> "Fraud has already been posted everywhere ($55b and counting)"
I'm looking for some evidence to support your $55 billion fraud claim, not just $55 billion in waste. If it's been "posted everywhere", please link to it!
"Just" lol. After a month.
Replace the fraud w/ waste if that makes you feel better about the audit.
I'm sure investigations will reveal fraud, it takes awhile to build a case.
But even if there is zero fraud (fat chance), gotta love the savings from waste cuts!
Please let me know when you find the evidence!
Also, I never said I dislike the audit. I do, however, dislike dishonest framing.