Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
godelski | on: We were wrong about GPUs

  > We can wish everyone were good at everything, or we can try to actually get things done.
False dichotomy. There's no reason we can't have both.

I want to be clear, there's no perfect code or a perfect understanding or any of that. But the complaint here about not knowing /enough/ fundamentals is valid. There is some threshold which we should recognize as a minimum. The disagreement is about where this threshold is, and no one is calling for perfection. But certainly there are plenty who want the threshold to not exist. Be that AI will replace coders or coding bootcamps get you big tech jobs. Zero to hero in a few months is bull.

ketzo | parent | next
It’s not a false dichotomy at all. You only have so many hours in a day. At a startup, it’s very unlikely (certainly not impossible!) that your differentiation will come from very cheap system orchestration - your time is likely better spent on building your product.

Minimum knowledge is one thing; minimum time to apply it is another.

sgarland | root | parent
If you had to spend time / VC money learning all of this stuff before you could begin to apply it, I absolutely agree, it's a waste of time. That's not my point. My point is people (by people, I mean "someone interested in tech and is likely to pursue it as a career") can and should learn these things earlier in life such that it's trivial once they're in the workforce.

I could go from servers sitting on the ground to racked, imaged, and ready to serve traffic in a few hours, because I've spent the time learning how to do it, and have built scripts and playbooks to do so. Even if I hadn't done the latter, many others have also done so and published them, so as long as you knew what you were looking for, you could do the same.

loading story #43065292
StefanBatory | parent | next
> False dichotomy. There's no reason we can't have both.

I'd kinda want to argue with that - it is true, but we don't live in vacuum. Most programmers (me included, don't worry) aren't that skilled, and after work not everyone will want to study more. This is something that could be resolved by changing cultural focus, but like other things involving people, it's easier to change the system/procedures than habits.

loading story #43065400
genewitch | parent
> there's no perfect code or a perfect understanding or any of that

I'm unsure what those terms mean. What are qualities that perfect code or perfect understanding would have?

Depending on your framing I may agree or disagree.

Just to lob a softball, I'm sure there are/were people that have a perfect understanding of an older CPU architecture; or an entire system architecture's worth of perfect understanding that gave us spacecraft with hardware and firmware that still works and can be updated (out of the planetary solar system?), or Linux.

These are softballs for framing because they're just what I could type off the cuff.

loading story #43065352