United States is classified as a flawed democracy. Partly because sweeping decisions like this one are made by Supreme Court Justices who nobody voted for and who hold their position for life.
Or maybe that's what you meant and you were being sarcastic with the quotation marks around "bastion of democracy"?
As in, due to their official stance, we should not expect reciprocity at all.
But you did pique my curiosity, where did you get that list of "full democracies"?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist_Democracy_Index
A number of democratic countries have residual symbolic figureheads.
In Canada the monarch is the judicial branch. Ministers are appointed and dismissed by the monarch. Parliament can be adjourned by the monarch.
When was they last time these things weren't rubber stamped?
What do you suppose would happen should the symbolic monarch not rubber stamp procedure?
Why is it that Canada, et al are regarded in the world as "full democracies" whereas the US is ramked a bit lower as a "flawed democracy"?
( See: peer comment with wikipedia link to democratic rankings )