Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

Show HN: News Minimalist – News ranked by significance

https://www.newsminimalist.com/
loading story #42768798
Semi-related: Wikipedia's homepage also contains a very minimalist, manually curated news section with only major world events:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events

Although that's perhaps way too minimalist?

loading story #42732948
loading story #42746186
Isn't significance heavily subjective though?

A lot of the most signficant stories are political, for example, which someone may have no interest in.

I have had this same idea in the past, tuning to my personal interests.

loading story #42731815
The "insignificant" feed has some interesting results, like this news story about a homeless man being arrested on felony burglary charges and $150k bail for breaking into a rapper's house simply to eat and use the restroom amid the LA fires: https://uproxx.com/music/kid-cudi-los-angeles-home-break-in/

Or this tip about how storing milk in the fridge door makes it go bad sooner: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/warning-anyone-storing...

Or this Dear Abby piece responding to a woman whose husband might have undiagnosed depression: https://www.mlive.com/advice/2025/01/dear-abby-trying-to-fig...

loading story #42750872
I've been using rss feed for few months but recently it became borderline useless. For example here is grep of pubDate:

    $ wget -qO - https://rss.beehiiv.com/feeds/4aF2pGVAEN.xml | grep pubDate
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 17:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 17:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 17:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2025 16:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 16:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2024 17:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 18:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 17:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 16:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2024 18:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 17:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 17:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 17:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 16:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
So since 6th november there were only 21 articles. Longest streak was 10 days and common is 3 days without any news whatsoever.
loading story #42731239
Nice work. Subscribed.

I had a very similar idea a while back. I wanted to rank news by "impact" which might be more concrete than "significance."

For an LLM prompt, it would be something like:

"estimate the number of people who's lives that will be materially changed by this news." and "estimate the average degree of change for those impacted."

Then impact is roughly the product of those two.

Additionally, I want a version that is tailored to me specifically "estimate the degree of change this will have on my life." + context of my life.

Tangentially, I've found that getting ratings out LLMs works better when I can give all options and request relative ratings. If I ask for rankings individually I get different and less good results. Not enough context length to rate all news from all time in one go though. Any thoughts on that? Maybe providing some benchmark ratings with each request could help? Something I'm exploring.

loading story #42732856
I like it! How have you thought about news sources getting snippy when you summarise them and don’t send traffic? Not accusatory at all, I’m still unpacking my own opinion on it and wondering how much pushback services will get.
I'd really like to see Top significant news for the past week/month. I'd rather try to read weekly/monthly digest than consume the feed every hour/day. Is that possible?
loading story #42733157
You don't have to use AI for this. Significance has already been figured out by how many news websites a news story has been published on. Which you can infer via RSS feed collection and looking at the title of the news story. The more platforms published the same title, the higher the significance.
loading story #42743891
I generate summaries and custom digests for my feeds— https://taoofmac.com/space/blog/2025/01/12/1730#daily-news-d...

Might take a stab at ranking them as well.

This is so cool. I love this application of LLMs
loading story #42731662
I use this sometimes and it's a nice source of news. But, and this is an honest question, will this get eaten by something like this?:

"ChatGPT, set a daily/weekly task to give me the most significant news. Use this ranking criteria: <input criteria>"

Wow, I really have wanted something like this. Have you spent a bit of work on prompting gpt-4 to get good results? Am curious what you found worked the best for your app
neato! Curious where you're sourcing the raw feed from. Wire service (AP, Reuters, AFP)? Google news? "the wikipedia current events page"? Something else?

As in every other engineering endeavor, the raw data you start off with has a lot to do with what you end up with, no matter what transforms happen. :)

loading story #42731724
loading story #42731799
The default sorting is "new first", but perhaps a better first impression would come from selecting "more significant first":

https://www.newsminimalist.com/?sort=significance

Nice. Similar to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35905437 (which summarizes for free)
I think the main differentiator for my project is news selection.

Most other aggregators show news based on 1) relevance, 2) upvotes or 3) coverage.

Relevance-based algorithms tend to put reader into a bubble, where the more they read on a certain topic, the more news they see on that topic.

Upvotes-based algorithms usually bring up a lot of clickbait and drama.

Sorting by coverage doesn't really work either, media often just follows people's interests and churns articles on what is "hot".

For example, last summer, a fight between Zuckerberg and Musk was at the top of most feeds based both on upvotes and coverage. Significance-based algorithm didn't even put it in the top 50.

I understand (also by reading your other responses here). Very nice, I like it. Is the summary feature based on one article (the top one mentioned), or does it combine all articles on that topic? And any roadplan for a native iOS app?
loading story #42732163
The results seem really bad, multiple entries are for the same thing and others are for very minor events. It looks like the frontpage of any random news site.
Most people live outside the US. So maybe change "World" and "Nation". Unless you are focusing on US only.

How can I filter out (block) subjects/words?

loading story #42732101
What’s the cost of running something like this?
this is really cool. some thoughts - a free trial would make a lot of sense for the subscription. Having the AI break things down into more variables than just significance might be helpful. For example - events vs trends. "Trump shot" vs "Shootings up X% YoY". Forward looking statements vs concrete events "Trump lays out agenda" vs "Trump signs executive order". All of those are significant in different ways. Also newness of the information is important. Top article right now is about Gazan families looking to return home post ceasefire. But that doesn't add much to the genuinely significant news yesterday of the ceasefire itself. As is, I don't get news that seems particularly different from browsing the headlines at 2-3 top newspapers.
loading story #42732935
How would this compare "significance" of news about the ceasefire in Israel/Palestine vs, say, a genocide that's large in numbers but smaller in world attention? (edited for clarity, given your reply)
loading story #42731312
Yeah, this is a great idea. Filtering the ranked output would be even better, especially if you could also exclude content by class (or keyword), as in...

rank by significance:

    NOT politics; NOT Trump; NOT republican; NOT democrat
loading story #42731741
{"deleted":true,"id":42716563,"parent":42716557,"time":1736973330,"type":"comment"}