It's roughly half as fast as 4096, which sounds bad until you realize that 3072 is already 20% as fast as 2048, 3% as fast as 1024, and 1% as fast as 512. In terms of performance tradeoff it's downright mild compared to the other steps up.
If I could waive a magic wand and get a 40-100% performance boost on a service by changing 3-4 characters (s/4096/3072/) why wouldn't I take it? (Assuming I need security go to beyond RSA 2028.)
Its not a 40-100% performance boost overall, its just during one specific step that is a very small part of the entire overall system.
loading story #42637501
{"deleted":true,"id":42638849,"parent":42637178,"time":1736373181,"type":"comment"}