which ones?
I don't. Let's be realistic: everytime we go "states rights" it's almost always so the state can control some sector of the population. We reworked the articles of confederation for a reason. We're one country. Not 50. Land of the free right?
Something as base as bodily operations should be a personal choice, just like any other religious belief out there. Not determined by the mood of your mayor.
If you want a purely logistical reason instead of moral: banning abortion doesn't ban abortions. It just increases infantcide, something we all disagree with. If someone doesn't want a baby, they'll get rid of it. Same ideas as prohibition. And do we really want to punish a woman for an operation she did on her body? In another state or in the backstreets?
>Besides, even Ginsburg was against the Roe vs Wade ruling. S
Yes, for reasons in that the Supreme Court doesn't enact laws. She instead wanted congress to make it a federal protection. But look how thars going. Almost like she knew a shift in the courts can remove it easier than a passed law...
>Another one is that ee pulled out of the Iran Nuclear deal.
I Guess it's nice we made up for Regean decades later. I'll give him that
Why do you prefer this over letting individuals decide for themselves? If the goal of democracy is to give power to the people, would this not be the most democratic option?