Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
> What was their failure here?

One, that last round of stimulus. Two, not agreeing to cutting spending when prices continued going up. Three, not massively greenlighting permitting around new energy and fossil fuels to bring energy prices into a deflationary stance. (Note: this is Monday-morning QB’ing from me.)

That stimulus thing seemed like a double bind. Lower stimulus would have meant less inflation but worse unemployment, right?

The whole pattern feels like a repeat of the country using Democrats to clean up messes (in this case, the mess was more Covid's than Republicans'), at which point they kick out the Democrats again. I don't think another massive tax cut (or extension of the last one) is a good idea.

> Lower stimulus would have meant less inflation but worse unemployment, right?

Yes, this is likely what would have happened. And in that case the Dems would still lose because people would be upset about the high unemployment.

> Lower stimulus would have meant less inflation but worse unemployment, right?

Yes, but you can target where that unemployment goes.

Democrats were probably too fair in distributing the pain. (As well as the fruits. Both the IRA and CHIPS Acts massively invested in counties that would have always voted Republican. That boosted turnout in an adversarial way.)

All tiny next to the money trump printed.
Sure. But that’s the last guy. The question is what Democrats could have done in power. With the benefit of hindsight, it would have been massively over correcting on prices and the border.
The US is, right now, producing more crude oil than any other nation in the history of the world. Harris repeatedly stated that she would not ban fracking. And yet, we keep hearing this BS about how Biden / Harris needed to do something about fossil fuels.

Of course what we need to be doing is halting all burning of fossil fuels ASAP, but that would be a losing electoral strategy. Who cares about the looming climate disaster, we need cheap gas...

The only actual issue there is that energy companies want a fire sale on perpetual resource rights on protected federal land they don’t already have access to.

The rest, and the part communicated to voters, is yet another fake issue. It’s exhausting.

Oil companies will not spend money just to lose it all on lower prices. Who is going to drill your hypothetical wells?