Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
lelanthran | on: Trump wins presidency for second time
> From a game theoretical perspective this is a good result. It is a clear reiteration of the message to the Democrats: you won't win by claiming to be 0.1% less bad.

Yeah, I said as much on a reddit comment prior to knowing the results: This is a good thing for the future of the Dems! They can now take this valuable feedback and put together a better platform to run on in future races.

Running on social activism isn't a winning strategy, no matter how loud that vocal minority is shouting.

a_victorp | parent | next
This has happened before... I don't expect Dems to ever really learn this lesson
notnaut | root | parent
Why would they? The party in its current form exists as a reactionary pressure release valve for after the actual party of action deconstructs the roadblocks that keeps the money controlling both parties from self-replicating.
yoz-y | parent | next
What kind of political landscape will democrats come back to in 2028? Doesn’t project 2025 aim to dismantle a lot of the current establishment?
lelanthran | root | parent | next
> Doesn’t project 2025 aim to dismantle a lot of the current establishment?

Didn't the Reps distance themselves from that? Vocally and repeatedly?

You may think that that playbook is their playbook, but apparently their distancing themselves from it worked well enough.

oaththrowaway | root | parent
Project 2025 is basically QAnon for the Democrats
ars | root | parent | next
Project 2025 is not an actual policy of anyone with power.

I saw so many ads by Harris complaining about it, and that's part of how I knew she would lose: when you fight against something that isn't real, you're going to lose.

gmueckl | root | parent
Trump and Vance will almost certainly pull strings to erode the current political system in Washington with no regard for the spirit and likely even the letter of the constitution.
vundercind | parent
Did Harris run on social activism? I didn’t get that from the campaign’s messaging. Not Biden’s, either.
dgfitz | root | parent | next
I believe social activism has been associated with the Democratic Party recently, I suppose it is implied when you run under their umbrella.
vundercind | root | parent
It’s rather tricky to fight this perception when it doesn’t primarily come from either one’s messaging or one’s actions.
lelanthran | root | parent
Not tricky at all: any politician can distance themselves from some fringe group of vocal nutjobs.

Even Trump has done so on occasion, like with the project 2025 conspiracy theory.

loading story #42061589
e40 | root | parent | next
It’s clearly the perception. Before Harris entered the race.
creato | root | parent
It doesn't need to specifically be Harris or Biden's policies to drag them down. There's very obviously a backlash against some progressive ideology going on, and the democratic party is clearly at least partly beholden to adherents of that ideology. That's why Harris can't give obvious and clear answers to (some) simple policy questions.
vundercind | root | parent
Yes, but the claim was they ran on that. Fixing the problem (if it is a problem) is a lot easier, and the necessary approach to fix it very different, if you ran on something and it backfired, compared with not running on it and still losing votes over it.

[edit] I also truly wondered if that’d been a significant part of their message, and I missed it—in the age of granular ad-targeting, who knows?