Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
... plus GLP-1.

GLP-1s baseline eliminate insulin for about ~40% of people. This boosts that number to 86%.

Note that Tirzepatide also reduces the chance of developing type 2 in the first place by 94%, and I suspect that newer generation receptor agonists will see higher insulin discontinuation rates in general.

Very cool stuff all around. Might finally be able to put this whole obesity-and-diabetes thing to bed.

Tirzepatide side effects sound pretty nasty, though less so than dying in a diabetic coma.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tirzepatide

The side effects are wildly exaggerated due to the current social media discourse on the subject.

I am in a pretty close knit community of 100s of people on the subject and while the side effects should not be discounted, figuring out ways to properly take the medication more or less eliminates them completely for nearly everyone.

The current dosing and schedules of the drug (and all GLP-1s for that matter) are largely an effect of what was tested during trials and not what will end up being most effective a decade from now. The rest of it is patient compliance and liability from drug manufacturers.

The most obvious two things to point at are that the half life of Tirzepatide is 5 days while the prescriptions are for 7 day intervals for ease of use. The other would be the rather large jumps in dosing (2.5mg per step) available in injector pen forms and prescribed.

Some bleeding edge doctors are willing to take the risk to go outside dosing and schedule guidelines, but not many.

Even then, the side effects seem to be rather minor compared to obesity or T2D and few and are far between.

I also had similarly reactions to the topic before I started to really look into it and dig deeper. I firmly believe these medications will change society at a level only antibiotics have so far.

I worked in pharmaceutical development and absolutely agree on the labeled dosing point. When each arm of your study costs X00 million dollars and Y years, you dont optimize dosing intervals. Moreover, there is no global optimum due to biologic variability in patients. Some patients are flat out non-responders, and some tolerate dosing intervals 10X the average.

That said, there is nothing magic about aligning the half-life and interval. 50% isn't a minimum concentration threshold for efficacy. depending on the product, it can be anything. Sometimes area under the curve is the relevant parameter. Sometimes you want the product to go under a limit before redosing.

The one part I disagree with is about bleeding edge doctors. Maybe it is my field, but I find doctors to be readily willing to completely ignore the labeling. Statutory protections are high for clinicians operating off label. If someone is interested, I suggest they raise it with their doctor. For most medications, the dosing is far from the individual optimum.

loading story #41876040
loading story #41875305
As the supply shortages are relieved, I think we’ll see a shift towards more pills. It’s poorly absorbed, so the dosage is way higher.

I was on Rybelsus for about a year and a half. It changed my life, and frankly, being able to skip a dose of I wasn’t feeling great eliminated bad belly side effects.

The side effects are usually short lived. I'm on tirzepatide and had some mild digestive issues for the 1st 3 - 4 weeks and haven't had any since then. My side effects when starting metformin were worse.
Directionally each generation of these drugs targets more receptors and has fewer side effects. Tirzepatide is also amazing in that people lost an average of 20.9% of their body weight in studies. [1]

[1] https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2206038

What if I didn't want to lose weight? Would I be a bad candidate?
loading story #41875333
loading story #41874726