Building out the toolkit of physics is vital to the advance of physics itself, and last I checked Ptolemy hasn't produced tools that have advanced our understanding of Bekenstein-Hawking entropy in black holes.
Those guys basically developed Fourier analysis with very clunky notation.
We'll be very lucky if these guys are doing anything even remotely as useful.
They produced conceptual breakthroughs that have advanced our understanding of black hole physics in ways not previously possible. If that was just lying around as a simple repurposing of a Fourier analysis, it wouldn't have sat around as an unresolved problem for decades.
But I understand that words meaning things is not part of the operative definition of success in the goalpost relocation industry.
loading story #41504133