Apple Passwords reliably updates passwords in its database before the password is confirmed to be actually changed. I've been locked out of accounts many times to this. They really need to focus on these basic UX issues.

I'll believe this when pigs fly.

There's a 0% chance it will work. Most websites I've seen have one or all of:

* Force you to use email or SMS as a "second factor" to unlock changing password even if you know the old password

* A stupid idea of password complexity usually requiring one of a finite set of 5-8 "special characters" which is often only revealed after you've chosen a password that doesn't have them. Or in some cases even banning characters other than the ones they check for. There's a standard for this where you put a regex on the password field, which a good password manager will always use, but the kind of idiots who think limiting the entropy of passwords to increase security is the correct way to do things almost NEVER implement this.

* A maximum password length, even as short as 16 characters in many cases

* CAPTCHA etc.

Any effort spent on this would be better spent elsewhere, including even educating other companies on how passkeys should be used.

1Password has been able to do this for five+ years. Frankly, it doesn't even really need agentic AI, although a talented team could probably make it perform better with agentic AI.

I don't really believe in Apple being that quality team.

I hope they don't feed the actual password into the model.